Earlier this month, we documented on a rumour that the western version of Bravely Next: End Layer only experienced “very good” endings to optional side quests – a modify which, when twinned with alterations to 1 of the character costumes, activated rather a stir between enthusiasts.
Nintendo has now issued an formal assertion on the make any difference, clarifying just why this modify was implemented. In accordance to the assertion, “mind-boggling suggestions” from Japanese players advised that the side quests – which would stop badly irrespective of the player’s actions – must be altered to make certain the participant does not experience “undue regret”.
With regards to improvements designed to Bravely Next: End Layer for globally release
Dependent on suggestions been given following Bravely Next: End Layer’s release in Japan, the development staff at Square Enix, in conjunction with Silicon Studio, made a decision to apply a variety of revisions to the activity for the reason of improving upon its top quality and creating a more pleasurable solution.
One particular these kinds of modify affects the game’s optional side quests, in which players experience a conflict amongst two opposing functions and pick out which get together to side with.
When the activity was produced in Japan, every side quest would stop with the staff lamenting the selection they designed, regardless of the player’s selection. This was meant to help players empathise with the characters’ situation, but mind-boggling suggestions from players indicated that they felt an unsatisfying disconnect amongst their intentions and the characters’ reactions. In response, these side quest endings were amended to demonstrate the get together commonly coming to conditions with their actions in a manner that does not trigger the participant undue regret for their selections.
These improvements do not have an affect on the gameplay or the training course of events in the activity, and were designed with the intention of improving upon the activity experience for players.
What are your ideas on the assertion? Allow us know by submitting a remark.