Symantec argues that greater cooperation with manufacturing is essential to for tackling botnets and DDoS attacks.
The cyber security industry has “fundamentally failed” to educate consumers about the risks of IoT hacking, and is not doing enough to ensure devices built with security in mind.
That’s according to Darren Thomson, EMEA CTO and VP of technology at Symantec, who believes that the industry’s approach to IoT security is outdated, reflective of a bygone era when it was deemed enough to simply respond to threats.
“In the next decade we will see a whole new level of threat, that means we are going to really need to raise our game,” said Thomson, speaking at London’s Infosecurity Europe event today.
“For the last 30 or 40 years, we have been fundamentally designing insecure systems,” explained Thomson, a process that meant companies like Symantec could come along and patch those holes when required. “When we’re talking about cities or rail networks, that benefit of the retrofit no longer exists.”
The IoT has increasingly been seen as a ‘wild west’, a series of networks that is proving to be incredibly susceptible to remote hacking. As connected technology has become more popular, security has become an afterthought for many manufacturers, either too difficult or too expensive to build in, according to Thomson.
Security as a result often falls back on the customer, where they are expected to carry out technical tasks beyond their capabilities.
“If [we] think sending non-technical people to websites to tick security boxes is enough, we’re kidding ourselves,” said Thomson. “This industry has failed its users in regards to education and awareness. As an industry we’re not meeting enough with manufacturers… everyone in the room is a tech person.”
This issue will be solved when the security industry makes an effort to become more “predictive”, according to Thomson. An example of this would be the formation of an “ingredients list” for the IoT, giving users exact information as to what to expect from a newly acquired smart home. This list, much like the dietary requirements on a food packet, would be a reference point for spotting unusual activity.
“It’s about time that everyone in this industry starts to think about the unintended consequences. We have tried and failed to make people security experts. It doesn’t work.”
This article originally appeared at itpro.co.uk